Navigating the Intellectual Property Landscape in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Towards a Global Legal Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2024v3si2253-258Keywords:
AI, Intellectual Property, Authorship, Ownership, Inventorship, Legal Disputes, Global legal framework, Proprietary rightsAbstract
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is challenging the traditional Intellectual Property (IP) frameworks that were designed under the assumption of human-centric creativity and innovation. This research paper delves into the complexities at the intersection of AI and IP law, examining how AI as a creator and inventor is reshaping notions of authorship, ownership, and inventorship. The study identifies specific conflicts arising from AI-generated content, explores global responses to these challenges, and proposes the development of a harmonized legal framework to address the unique issues presented by AI.
Key aspects include the debate over who should hold IP rights for AI-generated works - AI developers, users, or no one. And the transformative role of AI in IP management and enforcement. The paper analyzes landmark cases such as DABUS and Thaler v. U.S. Copyright Office, which highlight the divergent international perspectives on AI's role in IP. It underscores the urgency for international cooperation to establish consistent protection, avoid legal disputes, and promote fair competition and innovation. Furthermore, the paper emphasizes the importance of ethical and human rights considerations in adapting IP laws to AI, advocating for a balance between open access and proprietary rights, and ensuring fairness in IP protection. Recommendations include crafting AI-specific IP rules, enhancing global collaboration, promoting transparency and fairness in AI applications, and encouraging human-AI partnerships.
In conclusion, the paper calls for ongoing research and dialogue to develop a global legal framework that accommodates AI-driven innovation while maintaining fairness and equity, ensuring that IP laws continue to foster creativity in the AI era.
References
[1] Thaler v. Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Australia).
[2] Thaler v. Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and
[3] TradeMarks [2021] EWHC 2412 (Pat) (UK).
[4] Thaler v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, 16 F.4th 173 (Fed. Cir. 2021) (U.S.).
[5] Thaler v. U.S. Copyright Office, No. 1:22-cv-01564 (D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2023).
[6] Calo, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: The role of AI in IP law. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), 101-129.
[7] Binns, R., Veale, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Cambridge University Press.https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ethics-of-artificial-intelligence-and-robotics/6B4D5B7420C1F7E6D09D9A5B8B7EFC3E
[8] Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2021). Global challenges and responses to intellectual property in the age of artificial intelligence. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(1), 1-40.
[9] Miller, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: How AI is transforming IP management and enforcement. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 5(2), 134-155.
[10] Kesan, J. P., & Hayes, C. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the future of intellectual property management. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 30(2), 369-404.
[11] Ginsburg, J. C. (2019). Authorship and ownership in the age of artificial intelligence. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 42(4), 385-407.
[12] Duffy, J. (2020). AI as an inventor: Patent law's evolving standards. Stanford Technology Law Review, 23(1), 15-43.
[13] Bechtold, S. (2021). Global intellectual property law and artificial intelligence: Towards a unified framework. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 29(3), 207-227.
[14] O'Connor, T. (2021). Comparative approaches to AI and IP law: A global perspective. Cambridge International Law Journal, 10(1), 55-78
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ananya Mehrotra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Re-users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as the original work is properly credited.