Informational Content Of India Vix: Evidence From Volatility Envelopes, Causality, And Conditional Volatility Of Nifty Monthly Returns During 2015-2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i2100-111Keywords:
India VIX, Implied Volatility, NIFTY 50, Volatility Forecasting, Granger Causality, GARCH-XAbstract
Understanding and measuring market uncertainty is central to asset pricing, risk management, and financial stability analysis. Volatility, though unobservable ex ante, plays a critical role in shaping investor behavior, portfolio allocation, and derivative pricing. Implied volatility indices, derived from option prices, offer a forward-looking assessment of expected market fluctuations by aggregating heterogeneous beliefs and risk perceptions of market participants. Among these, the India Volatility Index (India VIX), computed from Nifty 50 option prices, has emerged as the benchmark gauge of market uncertainty in the Indian equity market.
While a substantial body of international research documents the informational role of implied volatility indices, empirical evidence for emerging markets—particularly at medium-term horizons—remains relatively limited. Existing studies on India VIX primarily focus on short-term relationships, contemporaneous correlations with equity returns, or volatility spillovers at daily or intraday frequencies. However, for investors, portfolio managers, and regulators, monthly horizons are especially relevant for strategic asset allocation, capital budgeting, risk limits, and macroprudential surveillance. Whether India VIX provides reliable ex-ante information at this horizon remains an open empirical question.
This study addresses this gap by examining the informational content of India VIX for monthly movements and volatility dynamics of the Nifty 50 index over the period October 2015 to September 2025. The analysis adopts a unified empirical framework that integrates volatility interval estimation, directional causality testing, and conditional volatility modeling. Specifically, the study evaluates whether the one-standard-deviation volatility range implied by India VIX successfully bounds realized monthly Nifty movements, whether changes in implied volatility anticipate future equity returns, and whether India VIX contributes incremental information in explaining realized volatility beyond historical return innovations.
The paper makes three key contributions to the literature. First, it introduces an interval-based evaluation of implied volatility in the Indian context, providing direct evidence on the economic validity of India VIX as a monthly risk envelope rather than relying solely on correlation or forecast error metrics. Second, it establishes the direction of information flow between implied volatility and equity returns at the monthly frequency, offering new insights into the forward-looking role of the Indian options market. Third, by incorporating India VIX into a GARCH-X framework, the study demonstrates the structural relevance of implied volatility in shaping realized volatility dynamics.
The findings have important implications for market participants and policymakers. For investors and risk managers, the results suggest that India VIX can serve as a practical benchmark for setting exposure limits and volatility-based trading strategies. For regulators and policymakers, deviations from VIX-implied ranges may provide early signals of stress and regime shifts in financial markets.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 outlines the objectives and research questions. Section 3 reviews the relevant literature and identifies the research gaps addressed by the study. Section 4 & 5 describes the data and methodology. Section 6 & 7 presents the empirical results, followed by a discussion of findings in Section 8. Section 9 concludes the paper and outlines limitations and directions for future research in Section 10.
References
[1] Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 885–905. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527343
[2] Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
[3] Banerjee, P. S., Doran, J. S., & Peterson, D. R. (2007). Implied volatility and market returns in the Indian stock market. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 6(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/097265270700600301
[4] Bekaert, G., & Hoerova, M. (2014). The VIX, the variance premium and stock market volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 183(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.05.008
[5] Blair, B. J., Poon, S. H., & Taylor, S. J. (2001). Forecasting S&P 100 volatility: The incremental information content of implied volatilities and high‐frequency index returns. Journal of Econometrics, 105(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00068-9
[6] Bollerslev, T., Tauchen, G., & Zhou, H. (2009). Expected stock returns and variance risk premia. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4463–4492. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp008
[7] Carr, P., & Wu, L. (2009). Variance risk premiums. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1311–1341. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn038
[8] Chakrabarti, G., & Kumar, R. (2020). Asymmetric response of implied volatility to stock market returns: Evidence from India VIX. Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies: Futures and Options, 28(3), 53–68.
[9] Christensen, B. J., & Prabhala, N. R. (1998). The relation between implied and realized volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00034-8
[10] Engle, R. F., Ghysels, E., & Sohn, B. (2013). Stock market volatility and macroeconomic fundamentals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00300
[11] Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., & Whaley, R. E. (1995). Predicting stock market volatility: A new measure. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(3), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.3990150303
[12] Gangineni, S., Reddy, Y. V., & Reddy, M. S. (2019). Dynamics of India VIX and stock market returns. Indian Journal of Finance, 13(9), 7–22.
[13] Giot, P. (2005). Relationships between implied volatility indices and stock index returns. Journal of Portfolio Management, 31(3), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2005.500363
[14] Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(7), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.800
[15] Koopman, S. J., Jungbacker, B., & Hol, E. (2005). Forecasting daily variability of the S&P 100 stock index using historical, realised and implied volatility measurements. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(3), 445–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2004.04.009
[16] Kumar, S. S., & Maheswaran, S. (2013). An empirical examination of the relationship between India VIX and stock market returns. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(4), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-01-2012-0008
[17] Mishra, A. K., Mishra, B. R., & Pradhan, B. B. (2025). Volatility spillovers between implied volatility and stock market returns: Evidence from India. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 16(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-025-02711-w
[18] Nath, G. C., & Samanta, G. P. (2016). Modeling and forecasting volatility in Indian stock market. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 14(1), 27–55.
[19] Shaikh, I., & Padhi, P. (2013). The impact of scheduled macroeconomic announcements on India VIX. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 7(4), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2013.848456
[20] Shaikh, I., & Padhi, P. (2014). Forecasting volatility in the Indian stock market: The role of implied volatility. Economic Change and Restructuring, 47(4), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-014-9148-2
[21] Whaley, R. E. (1993). Derivatives on market volatility: Hedging tools long overdue. Journal of Derivatives, 1(1), 71–84.
[22] Whaley, R. E. (2000). The investor fear gauge. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(3), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2000.319728
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tuhin Mukherjee, Subhrajyoti Mandal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Re-users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as the original work is properly credited.





