Digital Evidences, Cyber Forencics & Admissibility In Criminal Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i439-43Keywords:
Data Protection, Privacy, Forensics Evidence, Cybercrime, Digital EvidenceAbstract
In Today’s Digitalization world cyberspace has become an important area without which our work is not completed in any domain. New tools and techniques for gathering, analysing, and preserving digital evidence have emerged as a result of the expansion of digital data. Digital evidence, privacy, and data protection are only a few of the many concerns that have arisen in the field of digital forensics. Another major difficulty is the complicated legal framework for gathering and evaluating digital evidence. Despite these difficulties, digital evidence has developed into a vital instrument for the legal system and law enforcement, offering vital proof in both criminal and civil proceedings. Cyber forensics, as a specialized branch of forensic science, plays a crucial role in identifying, collecting, preserving, analyzing, and presenting such digital evidence in a manner that maintains its integrity and evidentiary value. Because of the rapid advancement of digital technology, cybercrimes increasingly represent a serious threat to society. Digital evidence obtained from computer devices is a major component of cybercrime investigation. However, proving that digital evidence is admissible in Indian courts might be challenging. For the investigation of cybercrime in India, digital evidence is crucial. The admissibility of digital evidence is governed by both "the Information Technology Act of 2000 and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)". The Indian Supreme Court has set specific guidelines for the admissibility of electronic evidence in court. In the fight against cybercrime, Indian courts have suddenly realised the importance of digital evidence. In conclusion, India's recognition of digital evidence as acceptable proof is a positive move in the fight against the growing worldwide problem of cybercrime. To effectively address cybercrime, India must continue to advance its legal system, technological capabilities, and professional understanding.
References
[1] Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
[2] Information Technology Act, 2000.
[3] Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.
[4] State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600.
[5] Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473.
[6] Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2018) 2 SCC 801.
[7] Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC 1.
[8] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
[9] Pavan Duggal, Cyberlaw: The Indian Perspective.
[10] Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Law of Evidence.
[11] Law Commission of India Reports (relevant reports on evidenc
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sheena Razdan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Re-users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as the original work is properly credited.





