Digital Evidences, Cyber Forencics & Admissibility In Criminal Trials

Authors

  • Sheena Razdan Assistant Professor of Law MKPM RV Institute of legal studies 22nd cross, 3rd block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i439-43

Keywords:

Data Protection, Privacy, Forensics Evidence, Cybercrime, Digital Evidence

Abstract

In Today’s Digitalization world cyberspace has become an important area without which our work is not completed in any domain. New tools and techniques for gathering, analysing, and preserving digital evidence have emerged as a result of the expansion of digital data. Digital evidence, privacy, and data protection are only a few of the many concerns that have arisen in the field of digital forensics. Another major difficulty is the complicated legal framework for gathering and evaluating digital evidence. De­spite these difficulties, digital evidence has developed into a vital instrument for the legal system and law enforcement, offering vital proof in both criminal and civil proceedings. Cyber forensics, as a specialized branch of forensic science, plays a crucial role in identifying, collecting, preserving, analyzing, and presenting such digital evidence in a manner that maintains its integrity and evidentiary value.  Because of the rapid advancement of digital technology, cybercrimes increasingly represent a serious threat to society. Digital evidence obtained from computer devices is a major component of cybercrime investigation. However, proving that digital evidence is admissible in Indian courts might be challenging. For the investigation of cybercrime in India, digital evidence is crucial. The admissibility of digital evidence is governed by both "the Information Technology Act of 2000 and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)". The Indian Supreme Court has set specific guidelines for the admissibility of electronic evidence in court. In the fight against cybercrime, Indian courts have suddenly realised the importance of digital evidence. In conclusion, India's recognition of digital evidence as acceptable proof is a positive move in the fight against the growing worldwide problem of cybercrime. To effectively address cybercrime, India must continue to advance its legal system, technological capabilities, and professional understanding.

References

[1] Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

[2] Information Technology Act, 2000.

[3] Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

[4] State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600.

[5] Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473.

[6] Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2018) 2 SCC 801.

[7] Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC 1.

[8] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[9] Pavan Duggal, Cyberlaw: The Indian Perspective.

[10] Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Law of Evidence.

[11] Law Commission of India Reports (relevant reports on evidenc

Downloads

Published

05-10-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Sheena Razdan 2026. Digital Evidences, Cyber Forencics & Admissibility In Criminal Trials. International Journal of Innovations in Science Engineering And Management. 5, 4 (Oct. 2026), 39–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i439-43.